10
Oct

Here’s Humphrey

   Posted by: Patrick   in Scott

After all the attempts by Labor to attack John Howard’s credibility and to scare the electorate off over the thought of a Costello lead government the people finally had their chance to put the ledger straight.
In what many of us in the blogsphere had already predicted, John Winston Howard was re-elected for a fourth term with a majority. Labor didn’t enhance their prospects either by signing up with the radical Greens and Bob Brown, which inevitably lost senate seats for Labor.
I quoted in earlier posts that it didn’t behove Labor to have someone so opposed to Christian or family values as Bob Brown in their midst or to name call these very people [Family First] leading up to our biggest Christian festival, Christmas. Family First may now hold the balance of power in the Senate and at the same time put Bob Brown back in his bottle.
Labor ran possibly the dirtiest campaign in our political history and it backfired; yet they still just don’t get it. All we heard from the likes of Crean, Beazely and McMullan were moans over a fear campaign based on a lie, interest rates. Unfortunately for Labor, people know it was a legitimate claim for the coalition to make as historical evidence proved them right. But interest rates alone didn’t win the election.
Labor were hell bent on removing choice, choice of education, choice of health, choice of employment, choice on childcare and the list went on. Add to that, people had to envisage the likes of Latham and Bob Brown having to negotiate with the US after both had called George Bush the “world’s most dangerous man” and “the worlds biggest terrorist”. Pretty dumb politically one would think!
Mark Latham in all probability ended any hope of it being close when he aggressively grabbed the PM’s hand outside the broadcast booth at a Sydney radio station and then looked like he was about to head butt the PM. It was a gutless act and extremely poor politics to try and physically intimidate the PM for all of Australia to see. Latham is just a thug!
The Labor states didn’t help either with many voters realizing that the hospital crisis is actually the fault of the state Labor governments as is the public schools.
For Labor, their political future looks abysmal. Who on their front bench has the capacity to grab the electorate’s attention and instill confidence in them?
Surely Labor must now concede that Kim Beazely and Simon Crean aren’t doing Labor any favors, nor are Wayne Swann, Bob McMullan, Jenny Macklin or Craig Emerson. It’s simply a useless lineup of non-performers.
Will Peter Garrett push his case for the Labor top spot?
One thing is for sure; Labor now has to gain a swing of close to 5% in the next election to have a hope and that is an impossibility, considering they needed only a 2.2% swing on Saturday.
The entire smear mongering by Labor and its dirt units [johnhowardlies.com] didn’t even scratch the surface, the people just viewed it with the contempt and cynicism it deserved. All the media assistance and bias that Latham enjoyed has also backfired, the 43 signatories, the 54 “eminent” doctors, the actor’s lead by Philip Noyce, Scruffy, Brian Deegan, they all got told by the majority that they were fools. Democracy worked no matter how hard those mentioned tried to exploit it.
The result itself, a landslide, would also dismiss the theory that people don’t trust the PM, I would have to say he could rightly claim that he is indeed considered a trustworthy man and leader after the weekends results.
Latham was so desperate in the last day of the election that he tried to infer that Howard was a racist over comments he made in the mid 80′s. He just doesn’t get it.
I have no doubt that most people just don’t like Latham. Many can’t come to grips with his violent past and his treatment of his first wife Gabrielle Gwyther. Nor can they stomach his foul mouth and vicious remarks, e.g. Skanky Ho. Latham could benefit from the wisdom of a boxing analogy, “keep it clean and keep the hits above the belt”.
Australia is not ready for a Mark Latham styled leader and probably never will be. Labor will have to address their selection criteria within 3 years and if they hurl up Peter Garrett then they better get ready for a long time in opposition.

Humphrey B Bear has a better chance.

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 10th, 2004 at 9:05 pm and is filed under Scott. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

8 comments so far

Tony.T
 1 

Recite this to yourself – “Six More Years.” It has a very nice ring to it.

October 10th, 2004 at 10:01 pm
 2 

It does indeed.

October 10th, 2004 at 10:02 pm
Ginger
 3 

Well said Scott, we had a great victory despite our looney left press throwing everything they could think up at us and refusing to print anything positive about our candidates in the letters columns still I guess they work on the policy that nobody wants to read good news. Congratulations to all you bloggers out there who supported us with special thanks to Kati for her fireworks pic of Howard.

October 10th, 2004 at 10:03 pm
 4 

I have to say Ginger, I really enjoyed saturday night.
The vile mouth of Latham and his antics along with the protectionism the media granted him made it even sweeter.

The most stunning thing to come out of it was the increase in the younger vote towards the conservative government. Almost unheard of.

Another great result was the fact that the coalition now hold the balance of power in the senate. That virtually renders Bob Brown and the Greens useless. We now don’t have to get frustrated over the Greens anti-Howard backlash in the Senate and the Family First, who Bob Brown villified, now even with only one senate seat have more power than the Greens. How good is that? :D

Glad to see sanity prevail. You little beauty.

October 10th, 2004 at 10:04 pm
Ginger
 5 

Yes Scott, it sure is sweet, I think that I mentioned some time ago that our research revealed that our young people (14/18 year olds)were the most conservative generation we have ever had in Australia, maybe some of their good sense rubbed off onto their voting age peers. We trust that as they reach voting age we will have a solid base of supporters.
We do not yet have control of the Senate and are still watching the results, maybe by the end of the week we will know. Did you know that the G.G. had to step in and allow some Queensland voters an extra week to get their vote in as the Elect. Comm. stufed up the postal vote forms, they said the printer was at fault. ^_^

October 10th, 2004 at 10:05 pm
 6 

Im still waiting to hear the outcome of the Greens ‘How to Vote’ cards that were distributed in the seat of Richmond.

It seems that the cards were designed to look like a Liberal/National card and it is said that it confused elderly voters as to who the conservative candidate was. It’s thought that as a result they ended up voting for the Greens candidate thinking they were voting for the coalition.

October 10th, 2004 at 10:06 pm
Ginger
 7 

In our polling booth the elderly were voting for “Liberal Forests” on the Senate paper, the paper was so large that when they saw “Liberal” thinking it was us they put 1 in the box as they had probably never heard of “Liberal Forests” and I only found out when I was told that “Liberal” was the fourth box on the Senate paper which of course was not the case. We will have to think up some way to clarify just where we are placed on the ballot paper. :@ :@

October 10th, 2004 at 10:07 pm
 8 

Yep Ginger, I’ve since found out it is as you say.

That has to be fraudulent, it is so obviously deceiving.

October 10th, 2004 at 10:08 pm